Skip to content

fs.op.canonical still defined in terms of absolute(p, base) #1620

Description

@cubbimew

fs.op.canonical says it is equivalent to "absolute(p, base).", but absolute no longer takes a base argument as of p0492r2

More likely to be editorial, absolute still has a base argument in the synopsis of [fs.filesystem.syn], though it doesn't have it in [fs.op.absolute]

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lwgIssue must be reviewed by LWG.

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions