Message168758
@gcbirzan: Could you please open up a new issue? The current issue is fixed - it's just that the fix caused a new issue.
I would say that the `args` parameter was never intended to be anything but a list, so currently there's a documentation bug since that isn't stated explicitly anywhere. (But certainly the tests only test for lists, not any other sequences.)
Adding support for stuff other than lists feels more like a feature request, but given that it apparently worked by accident before, I guess we need to treat it as a bug. Probably the fix for that bug needs to have a ton of tests that check whether tuples work in all the various ways that parse_args is used. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012-08-21 11:54:58 | bethard | set | recipients:
+ bethard, eric.smith, kalt, r.david.murray, python-dev, wt, jeffknupp, gcbirzan |
| 2012-08-21 11:54:57 | bethard | set | messageid: <1345550097.95.0.835034356687.issue13922@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012-08-21 11:54:57 | bethard | link | issue13922 messages |
| 2012-08-21 11:54:56 | bethard | create | |
|