Message223142
Describing how a programmer would implement authentication is exactly the API I was referring to, and that includes the signature and semantics of _verify_user_credentials.
I agree that (1) seems the cleanest. I'd favor 1.1, NotImplemented, which lets the programmer see immediately what they did wrong. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014-07-15 19:56:10 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, pitrou, jesstess, zvyn |
| 2014-07-15 19:56:10 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1405454170.63.0.971181733425.issue21935@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-07-15 19:56:10 | r.david.murray | link | issue21935 messages |
| 2014-07-15 19:56:10 | r.david.murray | create | |
|