➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients Arfrever, benjamin.peterson, docs@python, flox, gvanrossum, jaraco, jgeralnik, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, zach.ware
Date 2015-12-23.01:12:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1450833134.2893250.474527233.32FFBF84@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-reply-to <1450514077.42.0.877797437741.issue15068@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
That individually is probably okay. It's more a question of whether the
entire change is appropriate for 2.7.

Note PendingDeprecationWarning is fairly useless, since it's rarely
enabled.

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015, at 00:34, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
> 
> Benjamin, is it good to add PendingDeprecationWarning in 2.7?
> 
> ----------
> nosy: +benjamin.peterson
> versions:  -Python 3.4
> 
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15068>
> _______________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2015-12-23 01:12:18benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, jaraco, pitrou, Arfrever, r.david.murray, flox, docs@python, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka, jgeralnik
2015-12-23 01:12:18benjamin.petersonlinkissue15068 messages
2015-12-23 01:12:18benjamin.petersoncreate