Message261789
Here is a patch that improves coverage and addresses the uneven accuracy. Required accuracy is now specified in ulps. Mostly, I have choses 1 ulp, since this passed for me on an x86 architecture (and also ARM), but this may be too ambitious.
I have also responded to the comment relating to erfc:
# XXX Would be better to weaken this test only
# for large x, instead of for all x."
I found I could not contribute the code I used to generate the additional test cases in Tools/scripts without failing test_tools. (It complained of a missing dependency. The generator uses mpmath.) |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016-03-14 22:57:12 | jeff.allen | set | recipients:
+ jeff.allen, mark.dickinson |
| 2016-03-14 22:57:11 | jeff.allen | set | messageid: <1457996231.43.0.715566748988.issue26040@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-03-14 22:57:11 | jeff.allen | link | issue26040 messages |
| 2016-03-14 22:57:11 | jeff.allen | create | |
|