Message 292869 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	MicroTransactionsMatterToo, ncoghlan, ned.deily, rbcollins, ronaldoussoren, vstinner
Date	2017-05-03.09:41:40
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1493804500.12.0.938208835628.issue28087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Instead of skipping the test, it would be safer to not provide select.poll() if it's known to be broken. Curl added a check in configure: https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/9297ca49f5f3caca938a679b9c1feeb719e61ddb The problem is that I understood that Python provides a single binary for all supported macOS versions. So if we go for a check, it should be done as runtime, as the current select_have_broken_poll() test written for macOS. On macOS without the bug, curl check takes 0.5 second which is not ideal :-/ Would it be possible to design a test which doesn't block?

Instead of skipping the test, it would be safer to not provide select.poll() if it's known to be broken. Curl added a check in configure:
https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/9297ca49f5f3caca938a679b9c1feeb719e61ddb

The problem is that I understood that Python provides a single binary for all supported macOS versions. So if we go for a check, it should be done as runtime, as the current select_have_broken_poll() test written for macOS.

On macOS without the bug, curl check takes 0.5 second which is not ideal :-/

Would it be possible to design a test which doesn't block?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-05-03 09:41:40	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, ronaldoussoren, ncoghlan, rbcollins, ned.deily, MicroTransactionsMatterToo
2017-05-03 09:41:40	vstinner	set	messageid: <1493804500.12.0.938208835628.issue28087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-05-03 09:41:40	vstinner	link	issue28087 messages
2017-05-03 09:41:40	vstinner	create