Message 365051 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	veky
Recipients	John Belmonte, ethan.furman, veky
Date	2020-03-26.04:47:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1585198053.62.0.0676766834105.issue38250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
1. +0 _if_ the implementation is easy to explain. If backward compatibility is an issue, we can always add a property: for flag in flags.set: (though set might imply unorderedness:) 2. -1. Guido said long ago that all lens should be O(1). (Of course, if you do make it O(1), I have no objection.) 3. +1, absolutely.

1. +0 _if_ the implementation is easy to explain. If backward compatibility is an issue, we can always add a property: 
for flag in flags.set:
(though set might imply unorderedness:)
2. -1. Guido said long ago that all lens should be O(1).
(Of course, if you do make it O(1), I have no objection.)
3. +1, absolutely.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-03-26 04:47:33	veky	set	recipients: + veky, ethan.furman, John Belmonte
2020-03-26 04:47:33	veky	set	messageid: <1585198053.62.0.0676766834105.issue38250@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-03-26 04:47:33	veky	link	issue38250 messages
2020-03-26 04:47:33	veky	create