Message99528
Victor,
With issue2736, you included a variant of this patch where you use -1 as a sentinel value for tm_wday. I think this is a better choice. (The answer to the ultimate question of life is not universally known.:-)
On a more serious note, is checking for the -1 return value necessary? I would think a check for changed tm_wday would be enough.
Finally, a coding style nitpick: don't use superfluous parenthesis in logical expressions. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010-02-18 21:22:10 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ Alexander.Belopolsky, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, blais, vstinner |
| 2010-02-18 21:22:10 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | messageid: <1266528130.41.0.363510557367.issue1726687@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-02-18 21:22:08 | Alexander.Belopolsky | link | issue1726687 messages |
| 2010-02-18 21:22:08 | Alexander.Belopolsky | create | |
|