Add validation to the Test Score App problem

I'm getting an error message "Missing method body or declare abstract". I'm not sure what this means. I'm making a test score application that is supposed to validate user input before continuing and I'm stuck on this part. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
import java.util.Scanner; import java.text.NumberFormat; import java.util.*; public class TestScoreApp { public static void main(String[] args) { int scoreTotal = 0; int scoreCount = 0; int testScore = 0; double averageScore = 0; Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in); String choice = "y"; while (!choice.equalsIgnoreCase("n")) { // get the input from the user System.out.print("Enter score: "); testScore = sc.nextInt(); scoreCount += 1; scoreTotal += testScore; averageScore = (double) scoreTotal / (double) scoreCount; // see if the user wants to enter more test scores System.out.print("Enter another test score? (y/n): "); choice = sc.next(); } NumberFormat number = NumberFormat.getNumberInstance(); number.setMaximumFractionDigits(1); String message = "\n" + "Score count: " + scoreCount + "\n" + "Score total: " + scoreTotal + "\n" + "Average score: " + number.format(averageScore) + "\n"; System.out.println(message); } public static int getIntWithinRange(Scanner sc, String prompt, int 0, int 100) { int i = 0; boolean isValid = false; while (isValid == false) { i = getInt(sc, prompt); if (i <= 0) System.out.println( "Error! Number must be greater than " + 0 + "."); else if (i >= 100) System.out.println( "Error! Number must be less than " + 100 + "."); else isValid = true; } return i; } public static int getInt(Scanner sc, String prompt) { int i = 0; boolean isValid = false; while (isValid == false) { System.out.print(prompt); if (sc.hasNextInt()) { i = sc.nextInt(); isValid = true; } else { System.out.println("Error! Invalid integer value. Try again."); } sc.nextLine(); // discard any other data entered on the line } return i; } }

Your code won't compile because the getIntWithinRange method has 2 parameters that have values rather than names (line 41)

Thanks.