Skip to content

Commit 049b288

Browse files
committed
doc update suggestion
1 parent 8dff09c commit 049b288

1 file changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion

File tree

docs/node.html

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ <h2>
2121
<span class="sectionMark">&sect; 1</span>
2222
</h2>
2323

24-
<p>Yes <a href="http://nodejs.org">Node</a> does. That loader uses the CommonJS module format. The CommonJS module format is <a href="why.html">non-optimal for the browser</a>, and I do not prefer <a href="http://tagneto.blogspot.com/2010/03/commonjs-module-trade-offs.html">some of the trade-offs made in the CommonJS module format</a>. By using RequireJS on the server, you can use one format for all your modules, whether they are running server side or in the browser. That way you can preserve the speed benefits and easy debugging you get with RequireJS in the browser, and not have to worry about extra translation costs for moving between two formats.</p>
24+
<p>Yes <a href="http://nodejs.org">Node</a> does. That loader uses the CommonJS module format. The CommonJS module format is <a href="why.html">non-optimal for the browser</a>, and I do not agree with <a href="http://tagneto.blogspot.com/2010/03/commonjs-module-trade-offs.html">some of the trade-offs made in the CommonJS module format</a>. By using RequireJS on the server, you can use one format for all your modules, whether they are running server side or in the browser. That way you can preserve the speed benefits and easy debugging you get with RequireJS in the browser, and not have to worry about extra translation costs for moving between two formats.</p>
2525
</div>
2626

2727
<div class="section">

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)