[python-committers] PEP 462: Workflow automation for CPython
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Jan 25 20:55:10 CET 2014
On sam., 2014-01-25 at 06:35 -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:14 AM, R. David Murray
> <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky
> <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
> > do the latter in Python, which carries a problem we'll
> probably need to
> > resolve first - how to know that the bots are green enough.
> That really
> > needs human attention.
>
>
> By "that needs human attention", do you mean: dealing with the
> remaining
> flaky tests, so that "stable buildbots are green" is a binary
> decision?
> We strive for that now, but Nick's proposal would mean we'd
> have to
> finally buckle down and complete the work. I'm sure we'd make
> some new
> flaky tests at some point, but in this future they'd become
> show-stoppers
> until they were fixed. I think this would be a good thing,
> overall :)
>
>
> Non-flakiness of bots is a holy grail few projects attain. If your
> bots are consistently green with no flakes, it just means you're not
> testing enough :-)
There are certainly statistical ways to workaround the "necessary
flakiness", but that would require someone to sit with a pen and paper a
bit and figure out what the right metrics should be :-)
Regards
Antoine.
More information about the python-committers
mailing list