[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement

[Antoine Pitrou]

On Thu, 27 May 2010 14:29:28 +1200
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> On 27/05/10 01:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 
> > I would say it is precisely that extra configurability which separates
> > the executor pools in the PEP implementation from more flexible general
> > purpose pools.
> 
> Wouldn't this be better addressed by adding the relevant
> options to the futures pools, rather than adding another
> module that provides almost exactly the same thing with
> different options?

+1.