Python dynamic attribute creation

[WANG Cong]

On 06/30/10 01:25, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:

>> But if so why setattr() still exists? What is it for if we can do the
>> same thing via assignments? Also, in order to be perfect, Python should
>> accept to add dynamic attributes dynamically, something like PEP
>> 363. That doesn't happen.
>
> Setattr and friends exist to work with dynamic attributes.
>

Yeah, my point is why setattr() for dynamic attributes while assignments
for static attributes? Why not unify them?

> "The Perfect Language" does not exist, and never will.  I'm not even
> sure it could exist for a single person, let alone a group of people
> with disparate needs, patterns of thought, etc.
>

Agreed, but at least, the reason why I am being against so many people
here is also trying to make Python be more perfect with my
understanding.

Thanks!

-- 
Live like a child, think like the god.