Vars and getattr problem

[catosp]

Hello everybody,
I have the following problem:
This code works very well:

rm = visa.ResourceManager()
lakeshore = rm.open_resource('ASRL1::INSTR')
lakeshore.baud_rate = 1200
lakeshore.data_bits = 7
lakeshore.stop_bits = constants.StopBits.one
lakeshore.parity = constants.Parity.odd

What I want is to write the same code but in diferent way:

rm = visa.ResourceManager()
vars()["lakeshore"] = rm.open_resource('ASRL1::INSTR')

which is works, but if I want to add some properties of the serial conection like:

getattr(vars()["lakeshore"], "baud_rate") = "1200"
getattr(vars()["lakeshore"], "data_bits") = "7"
getattr(vars()["lakeshore"], "stop_bits") = getattr("constants.StopBits","one")
getattr(vars()["lakeshore"], "stop_bits") = getattr("constants.Parity","odd")

The program give an error like:

Error:
Can't assign to function call

I there a way to solve this problem ?
Thank you in advance !

[Gribouillis]

Yes there is a way, use setattr()

setattr(vars()["lakeshore"], "baud_rate", 1200)

You can also write

vars()["lakeshore"].baud_rate = 1200

The following syntax is impossible in python:

some_expression(some_args) = some_value

[catosp]

Thank You Gribouillis !!!
I will come back with results !

---

It works !!!

vars(self)["lakeshore"].baud_rate = 1200
vars(self)["lakeshore"].data_bits = 7
vars(self)["lakeshore"].stop_bits = getattr(constants.StopBits,"one")
vars(self)["lakeshore"].parity = getattr(constants.Parity,"odd")

Thank You again !!!!

[buran]

What I want is to write the same code but in diferent way:

any particular reason why you want to complicate things?
i.e. it makes sense to use getattr and setattr in some cases, e.g. if you want to access properties dynamically, but it doesn't make much sense to use vars() in this case.

[catosp]

What I want is to write the same code but in diferent way:

any particular reason why you want to complicate things?
i.e. it makes sense to use getattr and setattr in some cases, e.g. if you want to access properties dynamically, but it doesn't make much sense to use vars() in this case.

I work now on a project (which will be open source) that simplify the laboratory measurements based on PyVisa (GPIB, Serial, Usb, etc.). For this, is necessary to create a pseudo-language embedded in universal GUI interface. The results will be something like LabView but without graphical programing.

[buran]

I work now on a project (which will be open source) that simplify the laboratory measurements based on PyVisa (GPIB, Serial, Usb, etc.). For this, is necessary to create a pseudo-language embedded in universal GUI interface. The results will be something like LabView but without graphical programing.

my question was why this

vars(self)["lakeshore"].baud_rate = 1200
vars(self)["lakeshore"].data_bits = 7
vars(self)["lakeshore"].stop_bits = getattr(constants.StopBits,"one")
vars(self)["lakeshore"].parity = getattr(constants.Parity,"odd")

and not

self.lakeshore.baud_rate = 1200
self.lakeshore.data_bits = 7
self.lakeshore.stop_bits = constants.StopBits.one
self.lakeshore.parity = constants.Parity.odd

i.e.
something like this makes sense, but in your case you use hard-coded attribute names...

for key, value in some_mapping: # some_maping, like some_dict.items(), container with two-elelement tuples/lists, etc.
    setattr(some_object, key, value)

---

By the way, this should also work

setattr(self.lakeshore, 'baud_rate', 1200)
setattr(self.lakeshore, 'data_bits', 7)
setattr(self.lakeshore, 'stop_bits', getattr(constants.StopBits,"one"))
setattr(self.lakeshore 'parity', constants.Parity.odd)

in the last line I removed also the getattr used.

Still I don't understand why insist on use of serattr(), getattr() and vars()