➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2018-04-17 09:16 by anglister, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| timestamp_decimal_test.py | anglister, 2018-04-17 09:16 | test | ||
| Messages (6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg315385 - (view) | Author: Shlomo Anglister (anglister) * | Date: 2018-04-17 09:16 | |
Output for python2.7.11 2018-04-12-05:23:08.436252 2018-04-12-05:23:08.436252 Output for python3.4 and python3.6 2018-04-12-05:23:08.436252 2018-04-12-05:23:08.000000 |
|||
| msg315386 - (view) | Author: Shlomo Anglister (anglister) * | Date: 2018-04-17 09:43 | |
The test code demonstrates that fromutctimestamp(1523510588.436252000) != fromutctimestamp(Decimal(1523510588.436252000)) This is related to issues: 22627 and 23607 but not a duplicate |
|||
| msg316209 - (view) | Author: Dong-hee Na (corona10) *  |
Date: 2018-05-05 13:24 | |
Looks like this issue is related with bpo-23607. Since a decimal object is failed on PyFloat_Check(obj) of _PyTime_ObjectToDenominator, This regression bug is happened due to no chance to get float value from a Decimal object. https://bugs.python.org/issue23607 @serhiy.storchaka What do you think? |
|||
| msg316211 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * |
Date: 2018-05-05 13:32 | |
I think this issue is not just related to issue23607, but a duplicate of it. |
|||
| msg316309 - (view) | Author: Shlomo Anglister (anglister) * | Date: 2018-05-09 05:24 | |
Thanks @serhiy.storchaka and @corona10 ! I read it, documented the relation and failed to see the duplication. |
|||
| msg316310 - (view) | Author: Shlomo Anglister (anglister) * | Date: 2018-05-09 05:30 | |
This issue is in review stage for a long time. What's holding it? On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Shlomo Anglister <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Shlomo Anglister <shlomo.anglister@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Thanks @serhiy.storchaka and @corona10 ! > I read it, documented the relation and failed to see the duplication. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue33296> > _______________________________________ > |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:59 | admin | set | github: 77477 |
| 2018-05-09 05:30:52 | anglister | set | messages: + msg316310 |
| 2018-05-09 05:24:25 | anglister | set | messages: + msg316309 |
| 2018-05-05 13:32:26 | serhiy.storchaka | set | status: open -> closed superseder: Inconsistency in datetime.utcfromtimestamp(Decimal) messages: + msg316211 resolution: duplicate stage: resolved |
| 2018-05-05 13:24:37 | corona10 | set | nosy:
+ serhiy.storchaka, corona10 messages: + msg316209 |
| 2018-04-17 09:43:08 | anglister | set | messages: + msg315386 |
| 2018-04-17 09:16:46 | anglister | create | |