Optimized scalar observeOn/subscribeOn#2767
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Am I reading it correctly that this should really only benefit this case? => |
Member
Author
|
Yes, it optimizes for the scalar observing of a value. I assume this is a common enough case to warrant an optimized code path. |
Contributor
|
This is exactly the case I need :). |
Member
|
Code looks good. All internal changes. Thanks @akarnokd |
benjchristensen
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2015
Optimized scalar observeOn/subscribeOn
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Redone #2603.
Run on i7 920, 2.6GHz, Windows 7 x64, JDK 1.8u31
Note that since the tests create a lot of garbage, some perf numbers have quite some error margin: some appear to be faster with this PR while others appear to be slower, even if they are not affected by the changes.