oapi-codegen · jamietanna · Nov 28, 2024 · Nov 28, 2024 · Nov 28, 2024 · Nov 28, 2024
@@ -9,3 +9,41 @@
     Please re-raise the PR from a branch on your repository that isn't `main` / any protected branches.
 
     Thank you in advance 🙇🏼
+
+'auto:no-mentions':
+  comment: >
+    Thanks for your use of `oapi-codegen`!
+
+    We are very appreciative of your interest in improving the project, and that you're engaged with us.
+
+    However, @-mentioning the maintainers will be very unlikely to help move your issue along, and we do not want to encourage behaviour that leads to the "noisiest" users getting the benefit over folks who are waiting their turn.
+
+    Please remember that `oapi-codegen` is for the most part run by volunteers, and [we have a request out](https://github.com/oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen/discussions/1606) to companies who use the project to help make it more sustainable, with sponsorship.
+
+    It will only be that sustained financial support will be able to make it possible to work more efficiently towards user requests.
+
+    For more info on engaging with the maintainers, see [our CONTRIBUTING guide](https://github.com/oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#should-i--mention-the-maintainers-on-an-issue).
+
+'auto:pinning-until-release':
+  comment: >
+    [Until there is a defined release cadence planned](https://github.com/oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen/issues/1519), our [official recommendation](https://github.com/oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen/blob/main/README.md#pinning-to-commits) is that you pin to the latest commit on `main`, which will allow you to pull in this change.
+
+'auto:sponsorship':
+  comment: >
+    Please remember that `oapi-codegen` is for the most part run by volunteers, and [we have a request out](https://github.com/oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen/discussions/1606) to companies who use the project to help make it more sustainable, with sponsorship.
+
+    If this is high-priority for your organisation, please consider whether you would like to sponsor ongoing maintenance of the project, or that you may want to engage the maintainers to perform a one-off contract/bug bounty.
+
+    Also remember that although it can seem like "just" a "small change", the maintainers are on the hook for maintaining the changes:
+
+    > [No is temporary, yes is forever](https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/hands-on-design-patterns/9781789135565/3f396314-dac8-446c-ab02-768ae91296fa.xhtml)
+
+'reproduction:needed':
+  comment: >
+    Thanks for the report!
+
+    To help maintainers (or other users) help with triaging and fixing of the issue more easily, we need a [Minimal Reproduction](https://github.com/oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#minimal-reproductions) test case.
+
+    Please follow the instructions, and then share a URL to the repository.
+
+    We will not accept `.zip` files as reproductions, sorry!
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+'auto:no-head-branch':
+- head-branch:
+  - '^main$'
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+name: "Pull Request Labeler"
+on:
+- pull_request_target
+
+jobs:
+  labeler:
+    permissions:
+      contents: read
+      pull-requests: write
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+    - uses: actions/labeler@v5
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ Features that amend the way existing codegen works should - ideally - be behind
 
 > [!TIP]
 > The minimal reproductions for bugs may get taken into the codebase (licensed under `Apache-2.0`) as a test-case for future regression testing
+>
+> However, this can only be done if you license the code under `Apache-2.0` itself - if you are comfortable doing so, please do.
 
 When raising a bug report, or asking a question about functionality, it's super helpful if you can share: