bpo-37904: Edition on python tutorial - section 4#16169
Conversation
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). CLA MissingOur records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA: For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
ericvsmith
left a comment
ericvsmith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In addition to the grammar fix, you need to sign the CLA.
|
|
||
| Besides the :keyword:`while` statement just introduced, Python knows the usual | ||
| control flow statements known from other languages, with some twists. | ||
| Besides the :keyword:`while` statement just introduced, Python use the usual |
|
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
|
Although now that I think about it, this change is so trivial that I don't think it needs the CLA to be signed. But if you're planning on making other contributions, please consider signing it. |
I was under the impression that the CLA had transitioned from a recommendation to strict requirement for any contribution. Is this no longer true? |
|
3.6 is in security fixes mode. Guess we can remove the label for backport. |
|
Thanks @umoqnier for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7, 3.7, 3.8. |
|
GH-16234 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
|
GH-16235 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
|
GH-16236 is a backport of this pull request to the 2.7 branch. |
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly https://bugs.python.org/issue37904 Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith (cherry picked from commit b574813) Co-authored-by: Diego Alberto Barriga Martínez <diegobarriga@protonmail.com>
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly https://bugs.python.org/issue37904 Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith (cherry picked from commit b574813) Co-authored-by: Diego Alberto Barriga Martínez <diegobarriga@protonmail.com>
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly https://bugs.python.org/issue37904 Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith (cherry picked from commit b574813) Co-authored-by: Diego Alberto Barriga Martínez <diegobarriga@protonmail.com>
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly https://bugs.python.org/issue37904 Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith (cherry picked from commit b574813) Co-authored-by: Diego Alberto Barriga Martínez <diegobarriga@protonmail.com>
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly https://bugs.python.org/issue37904 Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith (cherry picked from commit b574813) Co-authored-by: Diego Alberto Barriga Martínez <diegobarriga@protonmail.com>
7 participants
A little change on first paragraph of python tutorial to be more clearly
https://bugs.python.org/issue37904
Automerge-Triggered-By: @ericvsmith