Skip to content

gh-62824: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8#32279

Closed
ringof wants to merge 6 commits into
python:mainfrom
ringof:bpo-18624-iso-8859-aliases
Closed

gh-62824: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8#32279
ringof wants to merge 6 commits into
python:mainfrom
ringof:bpo-18624-iso-8859-aliases

Conversation

@ringof

@ringof ringof commented Apr 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add aliases for iso-8859-8-i and iso-8859-8-e, which is the same as iso-8859-8

Co-authored-by: Ben Galin (bensws)
Source for this PR is derived from a patch submitted by bensws:
https://bugs.python.org/file35736/8859-8_aliases_and_test.patch

https://bugs.python.org/issue18624

@MaxwellDupre MaxwellDupre left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ran 266 tests in 4.734s
OK (skipped=13)
Looks ok.

@arhadthedev arhadthedev added the type-feature A feature request or enhancement label Feb 13, 2023
@arhadthedev arhadthedev changed the title bpo-18624: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8 gh-62824: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8 Feb 13, 2023
@arhadthedev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@malemburg (as an encodings expert)

@basbloemsaat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Will this PR be accepted? Why is it still open?

@malemburg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes, I'd accept the PR, but before doing so, the conflicts will have to be resolved and the tests need to finish without errors.

@ambv

ambv commented May 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing in favor of #134306.

@ringof

ringof commented May 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Will this PR be accepted? Why is it still open?

Looks like you get quick results your way!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting core review type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants